Monday, May 18, 2020

Stop-and-Frisk Policy - 1057 Words

The stop-and-frisk policy could be considered a big controversy facing New York in recent times. The whole concept behind this stopping-and-frisking is the police officer, with reasonable suspicion of some crime committed or about to be committed, stops a pedestrian, questions them, then if needed frisks the person. This policy started gaining public attention back in 1968 from the Terry v. Ohio case. A police officer saw the three men casing a store and he believed they were going to rob the store; this led to him stopping and frisking them. After frisking them, he found a pistol and took the weapon from the men. The men then cried foul and claimed they were unconstitutionally targeted and frisked. One of the biggest reason†¦show more content†¦Ã¢â‚¬Å"Once in a high-crime area, the police use every tool they have to send the message that law and order remains in effect† (Mac Donald). Knowing that police cannot take people from these high-crime areas and take away thei r weapons may spark fear in the residents living in those areas. Stop-and-frisk was initially employed as a sort of crime deterrent, a way to keep crime off of the streets. Without this policy, criminals will not have any incentive to stop carrying concealed weapons; this will cause crime to rise again and citizens to live in fear. With the abolishment of stop-and-frisk reasonable suspicion will have a stricter definition. In the Alabama v. White case an officer got an anonymous tip and then detaining the men based on that tip. (â€Å"Stop and Frisk†). The case questioned whether that tip was reason enough to detain White. People question whether the police have enough reasonable suspicion to stop half of the people that are stopped because of the stop-and-frisk policy. Rolando del Carmen, a professor of Criminal Justice at the Sam Houston State University, wrote, â€Å"A stop is valid only if an officer has reasonable suspicion that a suspect has committed a crime or is about to commit a crime†¦ In contrast, a frisk has only one purpose: officer protection. A frisk for any other purpose is invalid even if evidence of a crime is later discovered† (57). This clearly states under what conditions a police officer canShow MoreRelatedThe Stop And Frisk Policy947 Words   |  4 PagesThe stop and frisk policy came about many years ago. The stop and frisk is used for protection for the officer or officers. An officer can stop a suspect and frisk him/her for weapons, contraband or any other items if the officer feels any other suspicion. A Stop and Frisk do not require a warrant. This practice is very common now days, but similar procedures to stop and frisk policy started in the 1980s. According to Clark (2015), the earliest origins of stop and frisk were used in 1994 by StreetRead MoreThe Stop And Frisk Policy772 Words   |  4 PagesThe stop and frisk policy allows police officer to search only to an extent where it is enough to protect the safety of the officer. The stop and frisk policy has caused racial disparities in minority communities; furthermore, it also inflicted pain, resentment and anger among minorities. NYPD’s aggressive style of policing has caused great distrust between the minority community and law enforcement. Law enforcement agencies and the cri minal justice system must understand the importance of trustRead MoreStop and Frisk Policy1804 Words   |  8 Pagesand cons of the Stop and Frisk policy in New York. This paper covers a short history of Stop and Frisk. It also will address the progression of the policy throughout the years. Furthermore, it will relate the topic to the management, gender, and race class focusing in on how the unconscious bias plays a role in how the police choose who to stop. The paper also includes some statistics of Stop and Frisk encounters. It will conclude with the group opinion of the Stop and Frisk policy. â€Æ' INTRODUCTIONRead MoreThe Stop And Frisk Policy2580 Words   |  11 Pagespatrolling the streets; many of these hours are used executing the Stop and Frisk Policy. The Stop and Frisk Policy has caused a lot of controversy nationwide. Recently there have been many cases where the Stop and Frisk Policy has resulted in the death of an unarmed individual, typically an African American male. On July 17, 2014, Eric Gardner died while being arrested for selling individual cigarettes. The police used the Stop and Frisk Policy because they had reasonable suspicion. While police were arrestingRead MoreThe Stop And Frisk Policy1776 Words   |  8 PagesStop and frisk was created and is still enforced by Minnesota, New York, Philadelphia, Chicago and Los Angeles metropolitan police departments. The Stop and Frisk policy gives officers the jurisdiction to stop and search any individual that may infer any suspicious characteristics. Each person can be questioned via the suspicion of carrying a concealed weapon, regards of their whereabouts, searched for illicit drugs, and other contraband that may harm community members. Moreover, the officersRead MoreThe Stop And Frisk Policy3871 Words   |  16 Pagesthat right? This is happening in our community because of Stop and Frisk. I believe the Stop and Frisk policy based in New York City is a biased and unconstitutional tactic that police officers use. The Stop and Frisk Policy states â€Å"if the police have reasonable suspicion that a person is armed and dangerous, they may conduct a frisk, a quick pat-down of the person’s outer clothing.† (Law.cornell.edu/stopandfrisk) I am not Pro-Stop and Frisk: by stopping an individual based on the officers own suspicionRead MoreThe Stop and Frisk Policy Analysis Essay1225 Words   |  5 Pagespercent of stops in 2012, were Black and Hispanic people. Compare that percentage to the amount of water on Earth, only seventy percent. Now, imagine eighty-seven percent water covering the Earth. That would make the world unbalanced and difficult to live in, which is how life is for the minorities impacted by Stop and Frisk. One of the most debated and controversial topics in New York City is the Stop and Frisk policy, and the impact it has on police, Latinos, a nd African Americans. Stop and Frisk failsRead MoreStop Frisk Policy? Racist or not? Essay2309 Words   |  10 PagesThe famous and controversial police practice known as the stop and frisk started on the last sixties. It was known national wide when the case Terry v. Ohio was presented this case was argued on December 12, 1967 it all started when Cleveland detective McFadden was on patrol on a foot post where he noticed the petitioner John W. Terry and another men known as Chilton were acting suspiciously on a street corner the detective noticed both men looking into a store multiple times with an interest toRead MoreThe Stop and Frisk Policy of the NYPD is Not Justifiable Essay examples2281 Words   |  10 Pagesprofiling amongst arrests. The stop and frisk policy of the NYPD has caused much controversy and publicity since being applied because of the clear racial disparity in stops. Now the question remains; Are cops being racially biased when choosing whom to stop or are they just targeting â€Å"high crime† neighborhoods, thus choosing minorities by default? This paper will examine the history behind stop and frisk policies. Along with referenced facts about the Stop and Frisk Policy, this paper will include andRead MoreThe New York Police Department’s Stop and Frisk Policy: A Time Series Analysis2759 Words   |  12 Pages INTRODUCTION At the core of the stop and frisk policy as utilized by the New York Police Department is racial profiling. Racial profiling has a significant and often controversial place in the history of policing in the United States. Racial profiling can be loosely defined as the use of race as a key determinant in law enforcement decisions to stop, interrogate, and/or detain citizens (Weitzer Tuch, 2002). Laws in the United States have helped to procure and ensure race based decisions in

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.